"If I wanted America to fail"

2,671,462

Published by FreeMarketAmerica at 04/20/2012 13:11 Like

33,111

4,769

Why do you fight? Watch the video sequel to "If I wanted America to fail ..." here:
http://youtu.be/S6h9IJ15rdQ

The environmental agenda has been infected by extremism—it's become an economic suicide pact. And we're here to challenge it. On Earth Day, visit http://freemarketamerica.org/

* If you are new to TubeEncore, please refer to instruction to find out all the features of this website.

Latest comments

hogheadv2, at 05/19/2013 01:27, says:
I would Seize Bit Coin because it is a currency not backed by a UH,,,, OH,,,, UM.....Just because WE can and we Did So There :P
Duckyistrippin, at 05/18/2013 17:38, says:
fracking is bad mmkay. i hate obama, but systemic destruction of hte geological feature that literally supports the world we live upon. seems like a pretty bad fucking idea.
DEFTCON3, at 05/17/2013 21:05, says:
The video speaks to the gruesome reality of the fundamental change promised by Obama, the transition from a free market society to a socialist/fascist oppressive nanny state. Great video; keep up the good work. Ignore the barking socialist dogs that try to discredit the Free Market ideals by calling them fascist. Socialism and fascism are two dogs of the same breed and from the same Bitch. This video is TRUTH....socialist/fascist take the truth to be hard, for it cuts them to the very center.
THOMAS GIRLMAN, at 05/15/2013 02:04, says:
REOPEN AN INVESTIGATION OF 9/11 AND SEE HOW FUCKED UP YOUR GOP PARTY IS . AND THE DEMS !! 9/11 WAS A FALSE FLAG OPERATION . IT LED US TO ILLEGAL WARS . AND WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE MISSING 2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS DONALD RUMSFELD MISPLACED ON SEPT 10TH 2001 ? LOOK IT UP !! AND HOW DID BUILDING 7 TURN TO DUST IN MID AIR WHEN NO PLANE EVEN HIT IT ? LOOK UP DR JUDY WOOD , WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO . THE GOP IS CROOKED .
THOMAS GIRLMAN, at 05/15/2013 02:04, says:
SIR , YOU ARE AN ILLITERATE GOP SELLOUT TO AMERICANS . RAND PAUL IS A SHAM . A CORPORATE SHILL . COLLEGE STUDENTS THINK RAND PAUL WILL LEGALIZE POT WHEN POT WILL BE LEGAL SOON WITH OR WITHOUT RAND PALSY . SIR , IF OBAMA GOES , WHO CARES ? IF RAND PAUL GOES ,YIPEE HORRAY ! THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN AND YOUR GOD RAND PAUL IS ONE OF THE ONES BREAKING IT . I COULD CARE LESS WHAT HAPPENS . YOU GOPS FUCKED IT UP SO BAD , ITS AN IMPOSSIBLE ROAD BACK TO NORMAL .
zack helensworth, at 05/14/2013 20:26, says:
imagine what they are gonna think about the democrats? haha, I know what a joke right? I hope you know younger adults like in college for example 44% of them already support rand paul, which should be the democrats worst enemy cause he stands for our rights and the election year hasn't even started. the republicans are going to keep control of congress and take the senate in 2014, your obummer is gonna be going bye bye soon. I hope you know that.
zack helensworth, at 05/14/2013 20:19, says:
you know I love reading comments like yours. lets go back in history after the civil war. the south was in a critical spot. correct? you know what they did? built factories and railroads used coal and oil, cotton, grew their own crops. made the things made here cheaper, they made imported good more. this country was built on capitalism. its not capitalism its the way politicians use it. unlike obummer here that wants this country to go socialist. you can kindly go fuck yourself.
checkyoursources, at 05/14/2013 07:04, says:
Reasons this video is wrong 1) at 1.00: The vast majority of climate papers in the 1970s predicted warming. 2) At 1:36 Growing past the abilities of ecosystem services is demonised because it means short term prosperity followed by longer term poverty, not prosperity itself. 3) the video suggests that eradicating other species is a good thing and morally acceptable (does this include honey bees). 4) halting environmental damage is cheaper than replacing it artificially.
checkyoursources, at 05/14/2013 07:37, says:
Evidence that the Earth continues to accumulate heat are here: Robust warming of the global upper ocean Nature 465,334--337(20 May 2010) AND Global temperature evolution 1979--2010 Environ. Res. Lett. 6 (2011) AND An observationally based energy balance for the Earth since 1950 Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (2009)
checkyoursources, at 05/13/2013 08:18, says:
While the link between cosmic rays and cloud cover is yet to be confirmed, more importantly, there has been no correlation between cosmic rays and global temperatures over the last 30 years of global warming. In fact, in recent years when cosmic rays should have been having their largest cooling effect on record, temperatures have been at their highest on record.
checkyoursources, at 05/13/2013 08:12, says:
Nope, global warming due to increased GHG's was accepted well before the 1970's. It was first described in the 1800's! By 1980 the predictions about ice ages had ceased, due to the overwhelming evidence contained in an increasing number of reports that warned of global warming. Unfortunately, the tiny number of predictions of an ice age were picked up by the media, so it was those sensational 'Ice Age' stories in the press that so many people tend to remember despite more evidence for warming!
checkyoursources, at 05/13/2013 08:33, says:
Thanks for that ad hominem and huge sweepeing assumption about me, now try and keep on topic by stating which part of my comment you consider incorrect and why. Production wil be significantly less if ecosystem services have to be replaced by expensive artifical replacements that no longer give us free services as ecosystems do currently.
THOMAS GIRLMAN, at 05/13/2013 03:51, says:
GOP PROPAGANDA . PRO POLLUTION , ANTI ALTERNATIVE ENERGY HORSESHIT PROPAGANDA . FASCIST GOP PROPAGANDA . THIS VIDEO IN THE FUTURE WILL BE LOOKED AT AND THE FUTURE POPULATION WILL THINK WE WERE A BUNCH OF NEANDERTHALS . THIS IS THE GOP . A BUNCH OF IGNORANT NEANDERTHALS IN A SUIT !!
HopeForPeaceNow, at 05/12/2013 22:05, says:
I agree. That's why I support mixed markets.
mechanicalbu11, at 05/12/2013 18:23, says:
Nope, here is why, though they may had more white papers on global worming it was the ices age papers that were given the higher weight. Meaning these papers were accepted. Why? They had more evidence then the global warmers did, but as i said before they changed their tune when even the moons of Jupiter and Saturn had a very minute temperature increase indicating a solar cycle of universal warming. Then 10 years ago it was found that cosmic ray cycles also affected mean temperatures.
mechanicalbu11, at 05/12/2013 18:15, says:
Toxic capitalism is making as designed attitudes like yours. do not think for one moment the issues you expose on a daily basis is the outcome of capitalism, no not at all, it's extractionism by design and it's the most toxic form of capitalism. it is to capitalism as Communism is to socialism very bad. if we can regulate capitalism so that morality is first profit second then that is the ideal system to live under.
mechanicalbu11, at 05/12/2013 17:11, says:
Sorry dude, but your kind will kill even more folks by reducing production such that food will be priced so high that such an outcome will kill 750 million in the course of 20 years. you are a simple man if you can not see the horror your philosophy will bring to the human race. but that may indeed be what you want. You really should be complaining about unregulated capitalism and runaway socialism for out troubles.
checkyoursources, at 05/11/2013 18:18, says:
No need to make up statistics, go and do some research, I do it for a profession as a scientist and can confirm that damaging ecosystem services and then trying to replace them is many times more expensive than protecting and managing nature properly in the first place. p.s. World health organisation figures: Fossil fuel air pollution kills 3 million annually.
fuguf1sh, at 05/11/2013 15:26, says:
Please, make up more statistics for our entertainment.
checkyoursources, at 05/11/2013 13:37, says:
Reasons this video is wrong 1) at 1.00: The vast majority of climate papers in the 1970s predicted warming. 2) At 1:36 Growing past the abilities of ecosystem services is demonised because it means short term prosperity followed by longer term poverty, not prosperity itself. 3) the video suggests that eradicating other species is a good thing and morally acceptable (does this include honey bees). 4) halting environmental damage is cheaper than replacing it artificially.
checkyoursources, at 05/11/2013 13:16, says:
Fossil fuel air pollution kills 3 million annually. (3 times the amount killed by malaria)The human cost of this is not justified by the so called "cheap" price of fossil fuels.
Matthew James, at 05/10/2013 22:25, says:
Yes it is abundant and very clean to burn but the current strategy of fracking is highly destructive educated liberals don't support that because it is very bad. but the uneducated liberal sheep just think that its a typical "fossil fuel" and the minute they hear that their heads explode. Until we have a better way to get at the gas we have to be careful but we should NOT throw the entire idea out the window
Jake Danishevsky, at 05/10/2013 03:20, says:
Amazing video. Hits right to the point on what we have seen in the past few years. Great job!!
checkyoursources, at 05/09/2013 19:10, says:
Nope, 1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008).